However, the SCLC chose to hold out because Birmingham had impending mayoral elections. When they decided they could, they then prepared to protest (171). When those negotiations broke down because of promises the white men broke, the SCLC planned to protest through “direct action.” Before beginning protests, however, they underwent a period of “self-purification,” to determine whether they were ready to work nonviolently, and suffer indignity and arrest.
First, the SCLC confirmed that Birmingham had been practicing institutionalized racism, and then attempted to negotiate with white business leaders there. He then explains in detail his process of organizing nonviolent action. King believes the clergymen have erred in criticizing the protestors without equally exploring the racist causes of the injustice that is being protested (170-171). However, he then provides a moral reason for his presence, saying that he came to Birmingham to battle “injustice.” Because he believes that “all communities and states” are interrelated, he feels compelled to work for justice anywhere that injustice is being practiced. One of its affiliates had invited the organization to Birmingham, which is why they came.
He defends his right to be there in a straightforward, unemotional tone, explaining that the SCLC is based in Atlanta but operates throughout the South. King tells the clergymen that he was upset about their criticisms, and that he wishes to address their concerns.įirst, he notes their claim that he is an “outsider” who has come to Birmingham to cause trouble (170). King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) during their protests in Birmingham.
“Letter from Birmingham Jail” is addressed to several clergymen who had written an open letter criticizing the actions of Dr.
0 kommentar(er)
